Back to Food & Beverage

Audit-Ready Carbon Reporting for Processed Food Manufacturers

Track processing plant energy, packaging materials, agricultural ingredient supply chains, and cold chain logistics for packaged food operations.

Book Demo Start Free Trial

The Industry Hotspot: Agricultural Ingredients and Packaging

Ingredients and packaging dominate

Processed food carbon footprints concentrate in upstream agricultural supply chains and packaging materials. Agricultural ingredients including grains, vegetable oils, sugar, dairy, meat, and produce generate farm-level emissions from fertilizers, livestock methane, and farming operations. Ingredient mix determines product footprint with meat and dairy products having higher intensity than plant-based products. Packaging protects products and extends shelf life but creates material footprint from plastics, paperboard, and metal. Multi-material packaging complicates recycling. Processing plant operations consume thermal energy for cooking, baking, frying, and freezing plus electricity for mixing, conveying, and refrigeration. Cold chain distribution for frozen and refrigerated products adds energy and refrigerant leakage. NetNada tracks ingredient sourcing by type and origin, calculates agricultural supply chain emissions, monitors processing energy by product line, and reports packaging material weights and composition.

SASB Industry Definition

The Processed Foods industry manufactures packaged food products including frozen foods, snacks, baked goods, condiments, sauces, prepared meals, breakfast cereals, confectionery, and pet food. Operations span ingredient procurement from agricultural suppliers, food processing and cooking, packaging, and distribution through retail channels. Emissions concentrate in agricultural ingredient supply chains, processing plant energy for cooking and refrigeration, and packaging materials. Product portfolios combine diverse ingredients and processing methods creating complexity in carbon accounting.

View SASB Standard →

Industry-Specific Carbon Accounting

No generic solutions. Metrics, data sources, and reporting aligned to Processed Foods operations.

Agricultural Ingredient Supply Chain

Processed foods combine multiple agricultural ingredients each with distinct carbon footprint. Meat and dairy have higher emission intensity than grains and vegetables due to livestock methane. Palm oil, cocoa, and soy from deforestation-risk regions add land use change emissions. Wheat, corn, and rice generate fertilizer and farming emissions. Track ingredient sourcing by type, quantity, and origin region. Collect supplier farm data through engagement programs or apply agricultural lifecycle databases. Calculate ingredient footprint per kilogram for recipe-level carbon accounting.

Ingredient emissions by type

Processing Plant Thermal Energy

Food manufacturing uses thermal energy for cooking, baking, frying, pasteurization, and sterilization. Natural gas boilers or steam generation supply process heat. Ovens, fryers, and retorts consume substantial fuel. Freezing operations for frozen foods require refrigeration energy. Track fuel consumption and electricity by processing line and product type. Calculate energy intensity per kilogram output. Benchmark facilities identifying high consumers for efficiency retrofits or renewable energy.

Processing energy per kg

Multi-Material Packaging Footprint

Processed food packaging combines plastics, paperboard, aluminum foil, and adhesives protecting products and extending shelf life. Flexible packaging uses plastic films and laminates. Rigid containers use PET, HDPE, or polypropylene. Cartons combine paperboard with plastic or aluminum barriers. Multi-material structures complicate recycling. Track packaging specifications including material types, weights, and recycled content. Calculate packaging emissions per product unit accounting for material composition.

Packaging emissions per unit

Cold Chain Logistics Emissions

Frozen and refrigerated products require temperature-controlled storage and transport from manufacturing through retail. Refrigerated warehouses and trucks consume energy for cooling. Refrigerant leakage from equipment adds high-warming-potential emissions. Track cold chain energy consumption and refrigerant management by facility. Calculate cold chain emissions per kilogram product. Optimize logistics networks and implement low-global-warming-potential refrigerants.

Cold chain emissions tracked

Recipe-Level Carbon Accounting

Product portfolios include hundreds or thousands of SKUs with variable ingredient combinations and processing requirements. Recipe-level accounting calculates footprint from ingredient quantities, processing energy allocation, and package specifications for each product. Enables product comparison and identifies high-emission products for reformulation. Track recipe data including ingredient bills of material, processing time and temperature, and packaging specifications. Generate carbon footprint by SKU.

Carbon per product SKU

SASB FB-PF Metrics Automation

Auto-generate disclosure including gross Scope 1 and 2 emissions, percentage of ingredients from sustainable and deforestation-free sources, product recalls and safety incidents, percentage of products meeting nutritional guidelines, and packaging material mix. Footnotes cite production volumes by product category and key sourcing regions.

SASB FB-PF compliant

Product Features for Processed Foods

Use Carbon Data Uploader to import ingredient sourcing data, processing plant energy bills, recipe specifications, and packaging materials for automated food product emissions. Learn more →

The Activity Calculator applies emission factors for agricultural ingredients, processing energy, and packaging materials—calculating comprehensive processed food product carbon footprints. Learn more →

Related Solutions

See our Carbon Accounting solution for end-to-end processed food emissions tracking from agricultural supply chains through manufacturing and distribution.

View solution

Processed Foods Case Studies

How entities in this industry use NetNada to solve carbon accounting challenges.

Frozen Food Manufacturer (Prepared meals, pizza, vegetables, Product line across retail and food service)

Challenge

Retail customers required product carbon footprints for sustainability scorecards affecting shelf placement and promotional support. Ingredient emissions data limited especially for meat and vegetable supply chains. Freezing operations energy-intensive with refrigerant management concerns.

Solution

Deployed product-level carbon accounting with recipe-based approach. Engaged ingredient suppliers collecting farm-level emissions data for key commodities. Applied agricultural lifecycle data for remaining ingredients. Tracked processing plant energy by production line. Monitored refrigerant leakage and implemented enhanced maintenance programs. Calculated carbon footprint by product SKU.

Result

Generated carbon footprints for product portfolio enabling retail scorecard compliance. Identified ingredient sourcing and freezing energy as primary reduction opportunities. Reformulated select products reducing beef content and increasing vegetables lowering product carbon intensity. Installed efficient freezing equipment in plant upgrades. Transitioned to lower-global-warming-potential refrigerants in new systems. Published first product carbon labels on packaging for sustainability-marketed line.

Snack Food Company (Chips, crackers, cookies, baked and fried products)

Challenge

Corporate climate target required absolute emission reduction trajectory. Agricultural ingredients including palm oil faced deforestation concerns. Packaging waste reduction pressured by consumers and regulators. Needed baseline carbon footprint and reduction roadmap.

Solution

Implemented comprehensive carbon accounting aggregating ingredient supply chain, manufacturing energy, and packaging emissions. Assessed palm oil sourcing against deforestation risk using geospatial analysis. Evaluated packaging alternatives and lightweight designs. Modeled emission reduction scenarios including sustainable ingredient sourcing, renewable energy, and packaging optimization.

Result

Established baseline showing ingredient supply chain as largest emission source. Committed to deforestation-free palm oil sourcing with supplier verification requirements. Implemented renewable energy at major manufacturing sites through PPAs and on-site solar. Reduced packaging material through lightweight designs maintaining product protection. Launched product line using regeneratively-grown wheat demonstrating lower carbon intensity. Overall emissions declined while production volume increased.

SASB Disclosure Topics for Processed Foods

Material sustainability topics beyond emissions that investors and stakeholders expect disclosed per SASB standards.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

environment

Track Scope 1 from processing facility fuel combustion and refrigerant leakage. Report Scope 2 from manufacturing electricity. Calculate Scope 3 from agricultural ingredients, packaging materials, and distribution. Report emissions intensity per kilogram product or per revenue.

Sustainable Sourcing and Supply Chain

environment

Monitor percentage of key ingredients from certified sustainable sources (palm oil, cocoa, soy). Disclose supplier sustainability audits and deforestation-risk assessment. Track smallholder farmer support programs.

Food Safety and Quality

social

Report product recalls, foodborne illness incidents, and quality control testing. Disclose traceability systems and supplier auditing for safety compliance.

Product Nutritional Profile

social

Disclose percentage of portfolio meeting nutritional guidelines for sodium, sugar, saturated fat. Report reformulation efforts improving nutritional quality. Track whole grain and plant-based product development.

Packaging and Waste Management

environment

Report packaging material mix and recycled content percentages. Disclose packaging recyclability and reduction initiatives. Track food waste in manufacturing operations and disposal methods.

Energy Management

environment

Monitor manufacturing energy intensity trends by facility and product line. Report percentage of renewable energy in operations. Disclose process efficiency improvements and waste heat recovery.

NetNada tracks all SASB material topics, not just emissions. Our platform supports disclosure across environmental, social, governance, and business model topics relevant to your industry.

Processed Foods FAQs

Common questions about carbon accounting for this industry

How do processed food companies calculate Scope 3 Category 1 emissions from diverse ingredients?
Processed foods combine many ingredients requiring systematic approach: Ingredient inventory: Catalog all ingredients by type, supplier, and annual purchase volume. Emission factors: Collect supplier-specific data through engagement programs for high-volume and high-emission ingredients (meat, dairy, palm oil). Apply agricultural lifecycle database values for remaining ingredients. Recipe application: Multiply ingredient quantities in each recipe by emission factors. Aggregate across production volumes by SKU. Data quality: Track percentage of emissions from primary supplier data versus secondary databases. Priority: Focus supplier engagement on ingredients with highest impact (meat, dairy, vegetable oils) and highest volumes. Report methodology, data sources, and improvement plans for data quality.
Why are meat and dairy ingredients significant for processed food carbon footprint?
Meat and dairy have higher emission intensity than plant ingredients due to livestock emissions. Even small quantities in recipes substantially increase product footprint. Beef has highest intensity from enteric methane. Cheese and butter concentrated from milk have higher intensity than fluid milk. Small percentage of meat or dairy by weight can represent majority of product carbon footprint. Example: Frozen meal with minor beef component may have higher footprint than vegetarian equivalent with same total weight. Reduction strategies: Product reformulation reducing meat and dairy content. Alternative proteins (plant-based, precision fermentation) as ingredients. Sourcing from lower-emission livestock systems. Calculate footprint by product comparing meat-containing versus plant-based alternatives to inform reformulation decisions.
Should processed food companies include packaging in carbon footprint disclosures?
Yes, packaging is Scope 3 Category 1 (Purchased Goods) and represents substantial portion of processed food footprint especially for products with plant-based ingredients where packaging can exceed food content emissions. Packaging emissions include: Material production (plastic polymerization, paperboard manufacturing, aluminum smelting). Multi-material structures combining plastics, foil, and paperboard. Printing and labeling. Transportation to manufacturing sites. Calculate using packaging specifications (material types, weights), supplier data on recycled content, and lifecycle emission factors. Report packaging footprint separately from ingredient footprint for transparency. Reduction strategies include: Material reduction through lightweight designs. Recycled content increasing. Simplified structures improving recyclability. Consider trade-offs between packaging and food waste where insufficient packaging reduces shelf life increasing total lifecycle footprint.
How do different food processing methods compare for energy consumption?
Processing methods have different energy requirements affecting product carbon intensity: Freezing: High energy for rapid freezing and maintaining frozen storage requires substantial refrigeration. Retort sterilization: High-temperature pressure cooking in sealed containers for shelf stability uses steam. Baking: Ovens require sustained high temperatures consuming natural gas or electricity. Frying: Heating and maintaining oil temperature uses thermal energy. Extrusion: High-pressure high-temperature processing for snacks uses mechanical energy. Drying: Removing moisture through heat or air flow for preservation. Ambient processing: Mixing, blending, and cold processing with minimal energy. Track energy consumption by processing line and method. Calculate energy per kilogram output by product type. Compare frozen versus shelf-stable products accounting for cold chain requirements. Energy intensity affects product footprint and informs process selection decisions.
Can processed food companies reduce emissions through recipe reformulation?
Yes, recipe reformulation offers significant emission reduction potential especially by reducing high-impact ingredients: Protein shifts: Reducing meat and dairy content or substituting plant-based proteins. Example: Lowering beef in meal products substantially reduces footprint. Ingredient sourcing: Selecting lower-emission supply chains for key ingredients. Example: Sustainable palm oil, regenerative wheat, organic vegetables. Co-product utilization: Using food processing by-products as ingredients avoiding waste. Fat and oil optimization: Selecting vegetable oils with lower agricultural footprints. Processing efficiency: Simplifying preparation reducing energy-intensive steps. Report reformulation activities and carbon impact. Balance emission reduction with taste, nutrition, cost, and consumer acceptance. Test reformulated products ensuring quality maintained. Communicate reformulation benefits when carbon reduction aligns with consumer values.

Track Ingredient Supply Chains, Processing Energy, and Packaging Emissions

See how food manufacturers calculate product-level carbon footprints, monitor facility energy, and generate SASB-aligned disclosures—automated from recipe and operations data.

Book a Demo Start Free Trial