Back to Food & Beverage

Audit-Ready Carbon Reporting for Meat and Dairy

Track enteric methane from cattle, manure management emissions, feed crop production, and processing facility energy for livestock operations.

Book Demo Start Free Trial

The Industry Hotspot: Enteric Methane from Ruminant Livestock

Enteric methane dominates livestock footprint

Meat and dairy operations generate dominant emissions from livestock themselves. Cattle, sheep, and goats produce methane during digestion through enteric fermentation in their rumen. Methane has substantially higher warming potential than carbon dioxide over relevant time horizons. Emission rates vary by animal type, diet, and production system. Dairy cattle and beef cattle generate similar total methane per head but dairy animals produce milk offsetting emissions per kilogram product. Feedlot finishing systems concentrate emissions but improve feed efficiency versus grass-only systems. Manure management adds emissions depending on storage method and climate. Feed production including corn, soy, and forage generates agricultural emissions from fertilizers and land use. Processing facilities consume energy for refrigeration, meat cutting, rendering, and wastewater treatment. NetNada tracks livestock populations by type, calculates enteric methane using animal-specific factors, monitors manure management practices, aggregates feed supply chain emissions, and reports processing facility energy intensity.

SASB Industry Definition

The Meat, Poultry & Dairy industry raises livestock and processes animal products including beef, pork, chicken, eggs, and milk. Operations span animal agriculture (ranching, feedlots, poultry houses, dairy farms), slaughter and processing facilities, and distribution. Livestock generate substantial methane emissions from enteric fermentation in ruminants and manure management. Feed production including corn and soy creates upstream agricultural emissions. Processing facilities consume energy for refrigeration, rendering, and wastewater treatment.

View SASB Standard →

Industry-Specific Carbon Accounting

No generic solutions. Metrics, data sources, and reporting aligned to Meat, Poultry & Dairy operations.

Enteric Methane Quantification

Ruminant livestock generate methane during digestion as microbes in the rumen ferment feed. Emission rates depend on animal type, diet composition, and production system. Cattle on high-grain finishing diets generate somewhat lower emissions per day than grass-only systems due to faster digestion. Dairy cattle produce milk throughout lactation improving product carbon intensity versus beef. Track animal populations by production stage. Apply emission factors per head per day. Calculate total methane emissions and allocate across meat and milk products.

Methane per kg product

Manure Management Emissions

Livestock manure generates methane and nitrous oxide depending on management system and climate. Liquid manure storage in lagoons or tanks produces methane under anaerobic conditions. Dry manure with aerobic decomposition generates less methane. Manure application to fields releases nitrous oxide from nitrogen. Warmer climates increase emission rates. Track manure management system by facility. Apply emission factors accounting for storage type and temperature. Consider manure-to-biogas systems capturing methane for energy.

Manure system emissions tracked

Feed Crop Supply Chain Carbon

Livestock feed includes corn, soy, alfalfa, and forage generating upstream agricultural emissions. Corn and soy production uses synthetic fertilizers creating field emissions and energy-intensive manufacturing. Soy from deforestation-risk regions adds land use change emissions. Feed represents substantial portion of total livestock footprint after enteric methane. Track feed sourcing by type and origin region. Collect supplier farm data or apply regional agricultural emission averages. Calculate feed footprint per kilogram dry matter fed.

Feed supply chain emissions

Processing Facility Energy Intensity

Slaughter and processing facilities consume electricity for refrigeration, cutting equipment, and wastewater treatment. Rendering processes convert inedible byproducts into ingredients using heat. Cold storage maintains product quality. Track energy per kilogram product processed. Benchmark facilities within company portfolio. Identify high consumers for efficiency improvements. Consider on-site renewable energy or waste heat recovery from rendering.

Processing energy per kg

Dairy Product Allocation Methods

Dairy operations produce milk as primary product plus meat from culled cows. Calves become replacement heifers or beef animals. Carbon accounting requires allocating emissions among co-products. Economic allocation assigns emissions based on revenue contribution. Biophysical allocation uses protein or energy content. Report allocation methodology clearly. Milk typically receives majority of emissions with minor allocation to meat co-products. Cheese and butter require further allocation from milk based on processing yield.

Allocation method documented

SASB FB-MP Metrics Automation

Auto-generate disclosure including gross Scope 1 emissions from enteric fermentation and manure, Scope 2 from processing electricity, water consumption, percentage of feed from high-deforestation-risk regions, and antibiotic use. Footnotes cite animal populations, production volumes by product type, and processing facility locations.

SASB FB-MP compliant

Product Features for Meat, Poultry & Dairy

Use Carbon Data Uploader to import livestock population data, feed consumption records, manure management practices, and processing energy bills for automated meat and dairy emissions. Learn more →

The Activity Calculator applies emission factors for enteric fermentation, manure management, feed crops, and processing energy—calculating comprehensive livestock product carbon footprints. Learn more →

Related Solutions

See our Carbon Accounting solution for end-to-end meat and dairy emissions tracking from animal agriculture through processing and distribution.

View solution

Meat, Poultry & Dairy Case Studies

How entities in this industry use NetNada to solve carbon accounting challenges.

Beef Producer (Cattle ranching and feedlot finishing, Vertically integrated through processing)

Challenge

Retail customers required product carbon footprints for beef products. Enteric methane from cattle represented dominant emission source but varied by production system. Feed supply chain needed quantification including land use change risk from soy sourcing.

Solution

Implemented livestock carbon accounting tracking cattle populations through production stages from cow-calf operations through feedlot finishing. Calculated enteric methane emissions by stage. Surveyed feed suppliers on crop production practices and sourcing origins. Assessed deforestation risk in soy supply chain. Monitored processing facility energy.

Result

Established baseline carbon footprint showing enteric methane as largest source. Evaluated feed ration optimization potential to reduce emission intensity. Implemented feed sourcing requirements excluding soy from high-deforestation-risk regions. Generated product-level carbon footprints by beef cut differentiating grass-fed versus grain-finished products. Published sustainability report with reduction targets focused on feed efficiency and manure management.

Dairy Cooperative (Farmer-owned, Milk processing and branded products)

Challenge

Regulatory pressure expected carbon pricing on agricultural emissions. Member farms had variable emission intensity based on herd management and feed efficiency. Needed farm-level data to identify improvement opportunities and allocate sustainability incentives.

Solution

Deployed farm-level carbon accounting with member farms reporting herd size, milk production, feed consumption, and manure management. Calculated emissions per liter milk by farm. Benchmarked farms within cooperative identifying high performers and improvement candidates. Provided extension services for emission reduction practices.

Result

Achieved visibility to farm-level emission variability within cooperative. Top-quartile farms showed substantially lower emission intensity through better feed efficiency and herd health. Launched sustainability incentive program with milk price premium for farms meeting emission intensity targets. Average cooperative emission intensity declined over three years through knowledge sharing and incentive alignment. Marketed certified lower-carbon dairy products to sustainability-focused customers at premium pricing.

SASB Disclosure Topics for Meat, Poultry & Dairy

Material sustainability topics beyond emissions that investors and stakeholders expect disclosed per SASB standards.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

environment

Track Scope 1 from enteric fermentation, manure management, and processing facility fuel combustion. Report Scope 2 from processing and refrigeration electricity. Calculate Scope 3 Category 1 from feed crops and upstream inputs. Report emissions intensity per kilogram meat or liter milk.

Animal Health and Welfare

social

Monitor antibiotic use and resistance rates. Report animal housing conditions and welfare certification compliance. Disclose injury and mortality rates during transport and processing.

Feed Sourcing Sustainability

environment

Track percentage of feed from deforestation-risk regions (soy from Amazon, Cerrado). Report certified sustainable feed procurement. Disclose supplier engagement on agricultural practices and land use.

Water Management and Pollution

environment

Monitor water consumption in processing and animal operations. Track wastewater nutrient loading and discharge quality. Report operations in water-stressed regions and nutrient runoff to waterways.

Workforce Health and Safety

social

Report injury rates, repetitive stress injuries, and safety training hours for slaughter and processing workers. Disclose worker compensation and labor relations.

Product Innovation and Alternative Proteins

business model

Disclose investments in lower-emission protein products including plant-based alternatives, precision fermentation, or cultivated meat. Report revenue from alternative protein offerings.

NetNada tracks all SASB material topics, not just emissions. Our platform supports disclosure across environmental, social, governance, and business model topics relevant to your industry.

Meat, Poultry & Dairy FAQs

Common questions about carbon accounting for this industry

Why do cattle generate so much methane and how is it quantified?
Cattle are ruminants with specialized digestive systems using microbial fermentation in the rumen to break down plant materials. Methanogenic microbes in the rumen produce methane as byproduct which cattle exhale. Emission rates depend on diet composition, digestibility, and feed intake. High-quality feeds with better digestibility may reduce emissions per kilogram intake. Emission quantification uses: Tier 1: Default emission factors per head per day by region and animal type. Tier 2: Country-specific factors accounting for local production systems. Tier 3: Individual animal measurements in research settings. Most companies use Tier 1 or 2 approaches. Report animal populations, production system types, and emission factors applied.
How do dairy and beef cattle emissions compare on per-kilogram-product basis?
Dairy cattle and beef cattle generate similar enteric methane per head per day but product allocation differs substantially. Dairy cows produce milk throughout lactation with meat as secondary product from culled cows. Milk production offsets emissions creating lower intensity per kilogram milk compared to beef per kilogram. Beef cattle raised for meat receive all emissions allocated to beef product. Per kilogram protein, beef typically has higher carbon intensity than milk, which is higher than chicken, which is higher than plant proteins. Within beef, emissions vary by production system: Intensive feedlot systems have better feed efficiency reducing emissions per kilogram beef versus extensive grass-only systems which take longer to reach market weight.
Should meat companies include Scope 3 emissions from feed crop production?
Yes, Scope 3 Category 1 (Purchased Goods) includes feed crops which represent substantial portion of livestock footprint after enteric methane. Feed crop emissions include: Synthetic fertilizer production and field emissions. Diesel for farm machinery and irrigation. Land use change if sourced from recently converted agricultural land. Transportation to feed mills and farms. Companies with vertically integrated feed production may report crop growing as Scope 1 (operational control). Most companies purchase feed from suppliers making it Scope 3. Calculate using supplier data on farming practices or regional agricultural emission averages. Feed type significantly impacts footprint: Soy and corn have moderate intensity. Forage and grass have lower intensity but require more land area. Report feed sourcing by type and origin region.
Can manure management practices reduce livestock emissions?
Yes, manure management significantly affects emissions with several reduction strategies: Manure storage: Covered lagoons capture methane for flaring or energy use. Solid manure storage with frequent removal reduces anaerobic conditions lowering methane. Manure treatment: Anaerobic digesters produce biogas from manure converting methane to useful energy. Composting provides aerobic decomposition with lower methane but requires management. Field application: Incorporation into soil reduces ammonia volatilization. Timing applications to crop uptake needs minimizes nitrous oxide. Emission reduction potential varies by climate and manure quantity. Large operations with concentrated manure have better economics for digester systems. Small operations may focus on storage and application optimization. Calculate emission reductions from improved management practices.
Are plant-based meat alternatives significantly lower carbon than conventional meat?
Plant-based meat alternatives typically have substantially lower carbon footprint than conventional beef but comparisons depend on production system and product type. Plant-based products using soy, pea protein, or wheat generate emissions from: Agricultural production of input crops. Processing and ingredient manufacturing. Packaging and distribution. Lifecycle studies show plant-based products have lower emissions than beef (avoiding enteric methane), comparable or lower than pork and chicken depending on formulation. However, emissions vary: Heavily processed plant-based products with many ingredients have higher footprint than minimally processed legumes. Grass-finished beef from regenerative systems may have different profile than feedlot beef. Companies offering both conventional and alternative proteins should report carbon footprint by product category allowing consumers to make informed choices.

Track Livestock Methane, Feed Supply Chain, and Processing Emissions

See how meat and dairy producers calculate enteric methane, monitor feed sourcing, and generate SASB-aligned disclosures—automated from farm and facility data.

Book a Demo Start Free Trial